Comparing Hybrid and Native Apps_ Pros, Cons, and Future Trends

Comparing Hybrid and Native Apps: Pros, Cons, and Future Trends

Table of Contents

The process of developing an app is a very progressive one, and the developers are always trying to come up with a new way to make it the most user-friendly one. Two primary approaches dominate the scene: Some of the main categories of applications include hybrid apps and native apps. All of these systems have their strengths, weaknesses, and characteristics, which distinguish them from the others. In this article, we will be looking at determining the future on a particular project between the use of hybrid and native apps, Comparing Hybrid and Native Apps,  advantages and disadvantages of both and what future holds of the project given the selected choice. Explore more about our company on [our homepage].


What are Native Apps?

Native applications are built to operate on a certain operating system, be it IOS or the Android operating system. These are developed with unique platform based development languages such as; Swift or objective C for iOS and Java or Kotlin for android. These apps are available for download from app stores for use and installation on the device and its platform.


Pros of Native Apps

  • Performance: The native apps are targeted towards the particular operating system, hence they provide improved performance and reliability.
  • User Experience: These applications offer excellent usability experience that is homogenized across all the platforms since they follow design guidelines of the platforms they are being developed for.
  • Access to Device Features: Native apps have full capability to use the device features such as camera, GPS and other sensors because they are capable more than the web applications.
  • Security: These native applications often provide more secure data handling capability, and also use more enhanced different encryption methods.


Cons of Native Apps

Cost: Creating applications for different platforms takes time and money, and creating an application for, let’s say, iOS and not having it for Android would not be very effective.
Maintenance: The update work for and multiple systems all of which need their own code bases is very time consuming and complex.
Time to Market: Compared to the hybrid apps, the creation process of the native apps can take much more time, meaning that the time to market is much longer.



What are Hybrid Apps?

Web technology is used to create hybrid applications while the use of native technologies is for the native applications. They are essentially traditional win32/activex apps wrapped in a native container to enable them to be deployed across various platforms using the same code base. Popular hybrid frameworks include React Native, Flutter, and IO9 Turbolite.


Pros of Hybrid Apps

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility: By using one code to work on several platforms, developers are saved time and money in the process.
    Faster Development: Compared to native apps, one essential advantage that comes with the development of hybrid apps is the relatively shorter time to market.
  • Cost-Effective: Hybrid apps have less cost of development and maintenance that is why it is more cost effective.
  • Easier Updates: Instead of developing, updating, or fixing an issue on one platform then waiting for users to upgrade, it can be done across all platforms at once.

Cons of Hybrid Apps

  • Performance: Overall the quality might not be quite as great as a ‘true’ native app because hybrid apps are less resource efficient, especially when handling intensive operations.
  • User Experience: The appearance of the applications might not be as smooth and integrate as much with the device compared to apps that is natively made for the specific platform it is being used on.
  • Limited Access to Device Features: There may be conflicts between using web technologies and app store distribution which may limit hybrid apps’ device capabilities.



Comparing Performance – Comparing Hybrid and Native Apps


Native Apps

In terms of performance, native apps are considered superior due to the fact that they’re designed for a specific platform. As the applications can optimally utilize resources of a device and provide corresponding reaction speed and smoothness. This is especially important when it comes to business-critical apps, for instance, graphics-intensive games or applications that feature smooth transitions.

Hybrid Apps

Compared with native apps, hybrid apps have had some advancements made on their behalf in the recent past, they have not been especially outstanding and hence they offer relatively lower performance as compared to native apps.

A major drawback arises from the dependency on web technologies and the inherent switch between the web and native code, which may slow down the system. Dive deeper into our [blog posts] for in-depth insights and examples.



User Experience and Interface – Comparing Hybrid and Native Apps


Native Apps

One of the benefits of native apps is platform design guidelines, offering a more comfortable and natural app experience for the user. This has the flow on effect of making the user interface easy to understand and feel for the user, which leads to increased satisfaction. It also helps to create a more engaging experience when the play includes integration with the device’s features.

Hybrid Apps

Hybrid apps try to imitate the native environment across all platforms, but this may result in some trade-offs in certain aspects of the application. The design may not be a perfect fit for a specific platform which may lead to some lack of seamlessly integrating with it. But it is good to know that in the newer hybrid frameworks, this gap is gradually declining.



Development and Maintenance Costs – Comparing Hybrid and Native Apps


Native Apps

Sharing code between applications becomes a time-consuming and expensive undertaking since one has to create and maintain two different code repositories for each platform. This remains a significant challenge since each of the mentioned platforms caters to specialized developers, amplifying overall costs. Also, new releases or a fix for some bugs could be also a problem since they should be done separately for each platform.

Hybrid Apps

This approach still presents a clear cost savings since the code base is the same across all operating systems. If the number of domains is reduced and the possibility of developing interactive ones is limited, then problems with multiple development teams and maintenance issues will be minimized as well. Another major advantage is that new version development, updates and bug fixes can be deployed at once for all platforms, which also contributes to lower expenses.



Access to Device Features – Comparing Hybrid and Native Apps


Native Apps

These are built to run on a specific Operating System and have unrestricted access to the functions and the APIs of a device which makes it possible for the application developer to come up with a fully functional and well-integrated application. This is important for applications that depends much on the features of the device such as the GPS or the camera for augmented reality applications.

Hybrid Apps

The limitations of hybrid app development are that it offers restricted capabilities of its targeted to an operating system and access to device features depend on the capabilities of the framework used. Prestacked icon sets that are supported by new widgets are many, and reduced complexity also supports more options, but more sophisticated features might be difficult to implement or may not work as effectively as in native applications. Discover our full range of [services] to see how we can bring your app vision to life.



Security Considerations – Comparing Hybrid and Native Apps


Native Apps

In this aspect, native app has an advantage of being able to use security measures offered by the platform, which covers data encryption, storage and other features for securing native apps. This also makes them a good selection for apps which involve handling of sensitive information.

Hybrid Apps

The security aspect of hybrid apps is another point that shows that they can also be secure, though, they require more layers of security to protect data. Security has to be configured across several platforms, which can be harder and may take more time in comparison with filling in the gaps in security proofs.



Future Trends


Progressive Web Apps (PWAs)

PWAs are emerging as a promising alternative to both natives and hybrids applications developments. The cross between web applications and traditional mobile apps, PWAs deliver the full functionality and a seamless experience across platforms as well as offline support. It can be placed on the home screen and be used like any indigenous application, with no need to download off the store.

Employing More Hybrid Work – Organizational Models

Frameworks such as React Native and Flutter are still in the process of development, and these are noted to be offering nearly native like-performing hybrid apps. Looking into the future, as these frameworks grow, more organizations will implement this hybrid development strategy due to the cost and time saving benefits it possesses.

Enhanced Native Features

The native app development is set to experience further advancements as Apple and Google add new features and APIs in their new platforms. These improvements will deepen the significance of native apps for high performance and featuring apps, but are less relevant for cross-platform use and lighter applications.

Machine learning and Artificial Intelligence

Today’s native and hybrid mobile applications are widely integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to deliver custom-driven experience, to assist the most repetitive operations and to improve users’ experience. The use of artificial intelligence functionalities is likely to be a major issue that mobile application developers will embrace in the future.




In this context, both hybrid and native apps are appropriate in some circumstances while not suitable in others. Native apps perform better, provides better user experience, and provides full control of device functionalities and they are suitable for use in complex and functionalities applications.

Hybrid apps, on the other hand, offer cost-efficient development, shorter time of market release and are compatible for both systems which might be beneficial for businesses that want to expand their reach toward a larger client base while operating under a tight budget.

This is an indication that with the continuous advancement of technology, there is a clear blurring of the gaps as to which app is hybrid or native. As we see the emergence of PWAs and the constant enhancement of hybrid frameworks, developers can now have better implementations that would provide them with well-developed, efficient, and friendly applications.

That way you will be fully informed when it comes to the different trends and advancements now available in order to make the right decision in choosing the right company to handle your app development. [Contact us] today and let’s discuss your project in detail.

Leave A Comment

Go to Top